Have a Heart for Kids Day is your day to speak up for kids. Right now, your voice matters. Join hundreds of child, youth, and family advocates from across Washington state and speak up for kids!
Parents, child care providers, community members, and legislators gathered last week during a series of hearings across the state with the Department of Early Learning (DEL). DEL was seeking input on a set of new rules proposed for Washington’s child care subsidy program, Working Connections (WCCC).
The proposed rules would extend the amount of time a family has before they have to re-apply for child care subsidies from up to 6 months to 12- months. The new rule will apply to families who participate in Working Connections Child Care who have a child in Head Start, Early Head Start, or ECEAP. Currently, families are required to re-apply for their child care benefits at least every 6 months. Many families had to re-apply as often as every three months.. As we heard in Bellingham, Tacoma, Seattle, and Yakima last week, this reauthorization process is time consuming and difficult to go through– and leads to instability for kids in subsidized child care.
The change was spurred by the passage of HB 3141, successful legislation that Children’s Alliance and the Early Learning Action Alliance fought for last session. The bill extends the authorization period for a small number of the families in the program as a way to “pilot”, or test, how this change could lead to greater stability for kids, families, and child care providers. After the first year the program will be evaluated, and the longer authorization period could be extended to more families.
In this edition, you’ll find articles on Gov. Gregoire’s ideas to combat revenue shortfalls driven by the lingering recession with government reforms and budget overhauls. The state is facing another budget cycle with a projected $3 billion deficit. You’ll also find stories on options state lawmakers are considering if federal Medicaid funds are not approved and an executive order signed by Gregoire to improve access to healthier foods for Washington residents.
Working Connections subsidies make child care affordable for thousands of low-income families across Washington. But many families have to reapply several times a year to keep their kids enrolled – penalizing parents for slight changes in income that don’t make them ineligible, for losing a job, or for changing child care providers.
The result: Parents who are still eligible get mistakenly kicked off the system, and their children lose access to child care for weeks or months – disrupting their mom’s or dad’s ability to work.
The Department of Early Learning is making a final call for public comments on a statewide plan that will be a roadmap for developing a comprehensive, high-quality early learning system for Washington state.
This Friday is the cutoff.
After that, the Department of Early Learning (DEL), the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), and Thrive by Five Washington (the state’s public-private early learning partnership) will spend the next few months considering the public’s comments before releasing a final plan in the fall.
The federal government has finally released the guidelines states need to apply for their slice of $1.5 billion in new grant funding for home visiting programs, which connect new and expectant parents with trained nursing and early learning professionals.
The new guidelines issued late last week by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will allow Washington to apply for up to $1.3 million this year.
The first wave of these grants, part of federal health care reform that became law in March, will go to states this summer.
Over the next few weeks and months, we and our allies on the Washington Home Visiting Coalition will be working with state agencies and stakeholders on a plan for how Washington will use these home visiting funds.
There’s a well-funded threat to the common-sense revenue Washington lawmakers raised this year rather than relying solely on budget cuts. That revenue protected many vital services that support children, families and seniors; health care, education and the environment; labor, low-income people and communities of color.
Most other states also took a balanced approach by approving taxes on goods like candy, while the push to tax soda is gaining momentum across the country.
The Children’s Alliance played a leading role in the successful push for taxing candy and soda. Now a potential ballot measure jeopardizes more than $200 million of the revenue that we and other advocates fought so hard to raise. We’re urging people to decline to sign Initiative 1107.
As The News Tribune reported, Gov. Chris Gregoire has said repealing these taxes could force cuts to services like all-day kindergarten, preschool for 3-year-olds and maternity care for low-income moms.
Late last week, a court ruling against a challenge to I-1107’s ballot title cleared the way for signature-gathering to begin. The deep-pocketed beverage industry immediately poured more than $1 million into the effort to collect about 241,000 signatures by July 2.
You’ve probably seen signature gatherers with I-1107 petitions outside grocery stores and big-box retailers. We’re already hearing reports that signature gatherers are misleading people by claiming this initiative would repeal taxes on “food and beverages.”
Free speech is one thing. Misleading the public is another.
Do not let proponents of this initiative twist the truth about the very modest and targeted taxes our lawmakers thoughtfully debated before enacting.
There’s a decline-to-sign hotline you can call, e-mail or text to report any misleading information you hear from signature gatherers out there: 1-888-207-7307, WA.DeclinetoSign@gmail.com, 425-998-STOP (7867).
Read more about the decline-to-sign effort in the action alert we sent our 10,000-plus members today and on the 2010 elections endorsements page of our website.
Advocates have been on pins and needles waiting for a key U.S. House committee to release its plan for reauthorizing the federal Child Nutrition Act. It finally surfaced yesterday, and though there’s no official word on a cost estimate, it’s expected to invest $8 billion over 10 years – almost twice as much as the $4.5 billion a Senate committee proposed in March.
Crucial funding that’s needed to sustain Washington’s Apple Health for Kids program and other vital health care services in states all over the country is in serious jeopardy.